One of the many inhibitors of creativity is the experience of analysis paralysis. Whether you encounter it in life decisions, such as choosing between career paths, places to live, and what car to buy, or confront it in your creative pursuits, analysis paralysis comes in many forms. Recently, I’ve been battling this phenomenon of mental paralysis over the battlefront of creative writing. With my attention pointed toward other aspects of my professional career for over a year, many months of neglected essay ideas compiled over time, leaving me with a stockpile ready to pick from. Having a surplus of ideas may be presumably creativity-inducing; however, once the feeling of analysis paralysis sets in, it can be challenging to strategize a plan of attack to bring the topics to life.
Our culture is battling an epidemic of incongruency on the frontlines of all four pillars of wellness: intellectual, physical, social, and spiritual. This entry encapsulates a summary and analysis of personal observations and a second-hand investigation of congruence from a philosophical perspective. What does it mean to live congruently?
It is no question that architecture and archaeology are universally different in many categories. Architecture, being the art of building or designing structures, isn’t quite a scientific study. Granted, some components to architecture do involve scientific approaches and mathematical thinking; however, the overall field isn’t necessarily a branch of science. On the other hand, archaeology qualifies as a form of science...
If you'd like to be notified of new entries once they are published via Substack, just let me know your email address, and I'll make sure they find their way to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.